Skip to content

Maryland Transit Administration cyberattack

Summary

Maryland Transit Administration logo

Unauthorized access disrupted Maryland Transit Administration paratransit scheduling, call centers and rider information in August 2025. State records documented residual information-system effects into February 2026; Rhysida’s claim remains unverified.

Key facts

Timeline

  • Incident start:
    ? Earliest known or assessed start of malicious activity or incident activity.
  • First public signal:
    ? Earliest public indication of an outage, disruption, closure or other observable incident impact. The signal does not need to mention cybersecurity.
  • First public cyber evidence:
    ? Earliest credible public information connecting the incident or disruption to malicious cyber activity.
  • Official cyber disclosure:
    ? First official acknowledgment by the affected organization or an authoritative public body that the incident was cyber-related.
  • Last impact seen:
    ? Latest public indication that disruption, degraded operations, recovery work or unresolved impact was still ongoing.

Primary victim organization

Impacted locations

Organization types

Critical infrastructure sector

Incident characteristics

Assessments

Attack mechanisms

Data impacts

  • Data unavailable

    Authorized users could not access required data because of the incident, even when the data was not encrypted, deleted, or destroyed.

Operational impacts

  • Partial service outage

    A service, system, platform, or operational capability remained available only in part or with significant limitations.

  • Degraded service

    Services remained available but with reduced performance, reliability, functionality, capacity, or responsiveness.

  • Phone service disruption

    Telephone, voice-over-IP, call-center, or related voice communication services were unavailable or materially impaired.

  • Internal systems unavailable

    Internal business, administrative, operational, or staff-facing systems were unavailable.

  • Application unavailable

    A specific application or software platform became unavailable or unusable.

  • Records processing disruption

    The organization could not create, update, search, file, approve, transmit, or otherwise process records normally.

  • Scheduling disruption

    Appointment, booking, reservation, dispatch, staffing, or other scheduling functions were unavailable or impaired.

  • Dispatch disruption

    Dispatch, routing, assignment, coordination, or response-management functions were unavailable or materially impaired.

  • Transportation operations disrupted

    Transit, aviation, rail, maritime, logistics, fleet, traffic, ticketing, or related transportation operations were materially affected.

  • Service delay

    Services continued but with longer processing, response, delivery, or completion times.

  • Backlog created

    The disruption caused an accumulation of unprocessed requests, cases, orders, records, appointments, or other work.

  • Alternate service channel required

    The organization redirected users to a different website, office, telephone number, email address, provider, or service channel.

Extortion indicators

  • Ransom demand

    The victim received a demand for payment in exchange for restoring access, decrypting systems, preventing disclosure, or stopping another threatened action.

  • Leak-site listing

    The victim was listed on a threat actor or ransomware data-leak site as an alleged target or nonpaying victim.

  • Data sample published

    The actor published or shared a sample of allegedly stolen victim data to substantiate the extortion claim.

  • Countdown or payment deadline

    The actor imposed a deadline or public countdown before increasing the demand, publishing data, deleting keys, or taking another threatened action.

  • Payment denied

    An authoritative source stated that no ransom or extortion payment was made.

Incident narrative

Analyst assessment

Unauthorized access disrupted Maryland Transit Administration scheduling, call-center and rider-information systems in August 2025. The agency confirmed incident-related data loss, but did not publicly identify affected data categories, the entry method or an attacker. Rhysida’s separate extortion claim remains unverified attribution.

State procurement records place MTA’s discovery on Aug. 21. We reported that the agency acknowledged the incident Aug. 24 and could not accept new Mobility bookings or rebookings, although previously scheduled trips would be honored. These are distinct discovery and public-disclosure dates; the precise intrusion start is unknown.

Operational significance

The disruption affected access to transportation for riders with disabilities, rather than shutting down the entire transit network. Core bus and rail services continued. MTA introduced interim telephone reservations through MV Transportation on Aug. 29 and arranged additional medical-transport support.

Later procurement documentation identifies compromised Trapeze PASS and Ranger environments supporting reservations, dispatch and vehicle oversight. Recovery moved affected functions to cloud hosting and addressed reduced-fare application backlogs from August through November 2025. MV’s role as an existing operator and recovery contractor does not establish that it caused the intrusion.

Recovery extended beyond the initial restoration of bookings. A legislative budget analysis reported that, as of Feb. 1, 2026, services were operating normally except for residual Metro and light-rail signage and real-time information problems. A recovery contract’s term or spending ceiling does not establish the duration of those problems or actual incident expenditure.

Confidence and uncertainty

Confidence is high in unauthorized access and operational disruption because MTA and state records explicitly document them. Confirmed data loss does not establish whether particular records were stolen, destroyed or otherwise lost.

The Record reported that Rhysida claimed the incident and demanded 30 bitcoin with a seven-day deadline. Alleged stolen document types and samples remain attacker claims. This supports medium confidence in ransomware-related extortion and low confidence in the named actor’s responsibility; reviewed official evidence does not establish encryption.

A state technology spokesperson said no ransom had been paid as of the Oct. 1 report. Its broad restoration wording is qualified by remaining information-system effects described in that report and the later legislative analysis.

Analytic gaps

The initial access technique, exact intrusion start, affected record types and population, confirmed exfiltration, encryption, attacker identity and complete operational-restoration date remain unestablished. No incident-specific phishing finding follows from MTA’s general security advice.

The live Mobility page still describes an interim reservation system with some unavailable reminder and confirmation features. That undated section does not explicitly connect these particular limits to this incident. The September 2026 procurement request documents continuity arrangements and a prospective contract-expiration risk, rather than a new observed outage. Neither alone establishes continuous incident-related disruption through the research cutoff.

Operations are presumed resolved based on elapsed time since the Feb. 1, 2026 observation of residual information-system effects. Positive evidence of complete recovery remains absent. The exact end date remains unverified; containment, interim reservations and an undated webpage do not establish complete recovery.

Threat actor and claim

Listed as: The Maryland Department of TransportationSource: ransomware.liveDiscovered:

Claim details

Rhysida claimed the broader MDOT name in connection with the MTA incident. The Record reported a 30-bitcoin demand, seven-day deadline and alleged stolen document samples on Sept. 24, 2025. Official evidence confirms MTA unauthorized access and unspecified data loss, but not this actor, encryption or the claimed stolen document types. Aggregator discovery time is distinct from original claim publication; no stolen documents were accessed.

Organizations involved

Impacted locations

  • Baltimore, Maryland

    Baltimore is the administrative site anchor for the affected state transit agency. It is an independent city; this relationship does not assert every local route or service was interrupted.

  • Maryland

    Maryland supplies the governmental service context for the state transit agency’s multimodal operations and statewide support mandate. It does not imply all routes, all local transit operators or the whole state experienced an outage.

Sources

Cyber incident disrupts some Maryland Transit Administration systems

Our report documented MTA’s Aug. 24 acknowledgment and unavailable new Mobility bookings, rider information and call-center functions.

Cybersecurity Incident Update

MTA confirmed unauthorized access and incident-related data loss, interim Mobility scheduling through MV Transportation, and remaining information and call-center effects.

About the Maryland Transit Administration

MTA is an MDOT division operating multimodal transit and supporting local transit systems across Maryland.

Contact MTA

The official contact page lists MTA at 6 St. Paul St., Baltimore, Maryland.

Maryland Transit Administration — FY2027 operating budget analysis

The cybersecurity section reports normal service as of Feb. 1, 2026, except residual Metro and light-rail signage and real-time information issues.

Mobility — interim online reservation instructions

The live page describes interim reservations with booking and cancellation available, but reminder calls, vehicle-arrival calls and email trip confirmations unavailable.

See something that needs correction?

Signed-in members can report an error, update, or missing source.