Shoshone-Bannock Tribe

An August 2024 cyberattack disabled Shoshone-Bannock tribal government networks, email and phones and forced office closures. Staff returned with limited systems; later reporting describes a prolonged recovery, with no exact restoration date verified.
The incident is confirmed to be cyber-related, but the specific attack mechanism is unknown.
Authorized users could not access required data because of the incident, even when the data was not encrypted, deleted, or destroyed.
Internal or external network connectivity was unavailable or materially impaired.
Email sending, receiving, access, or related messaging functions were unavailable or materially impaired.
Telephone, voice-over-IP, call-center, or related voice communication services were unavailable or materially impaired.
Internal business, administrative, operational, or staff-facing systems were unavailable.
Staff, customers, patients, students, residents, or other users could not access records or case information normally.
Public administrative, licensing, permitting, court, tax, records, benefits, or other government services were materially affected.
One or more offices, schools, clinics, stores, plants, branches, or other facilities closed because of the incident.
Services continued but with longer processing, response, delivery, or completion times.
The organization redirected users to a different website, office, telephone number, email address, provider, or service channel.
Employees or contractors were unable to perform normal duties because systems, data, facilities, or communications were unavailable.
Employees were sent home, placed on administrative leave, furloughed, or otherwise removed from normal duties because of the incident.
Customers, residents, patients, students, vendors, or members of the public faced access restrictions or could not use services normally.
The incident may involve extortion, but available evidence does not establish which extortion indicators were present.
A confirmed August 2024 cyberattack disrupted the Shoshone-Bannock tribal government’s communications and public services in Fort Hall, Idaho. The tribes’ Aug. 22 statement dates discovery to Aug. 16 and says investigators established that a network security incident had occurred. The original public notice dated Aug. 19 warned employees and tribal members about possible unauthorized access to personal information; the reviewed evidence does not establish the intrusion method.
The incident is presumed resolved, with no established final restoration date. Returning staff to work did not establish recovery: the tribes’ late-August update said services remained limited and network and telephone access were unavailable. Later reporting describes a substantially longer recovery, so neither Aug. 27 nor the Aug. 28 staff return establishes full system restoration.
The government closed offices Aug. 19 and again Aug. 22-23, dismissing staff while responders worked on equipment. Email, network and telephone services were offline, disrupting administration and access to services. The return-to-work notice required employees to obtain duties from supervisors and prohibited use of network-connected or unsanitized equipment; departments used cellphones as an alternate contact channel.
Indianz.com’s Aug. 29 reporting identifies gaming, economic development and agriculture operations, housing, and the reservation’s junior/senior high school as operating on separate systems that were not affected. East Idaho News reported unavailable police records and redirected vehicle-inspection requests, but explicitly said the connection between electronic-payment problems and the attack was unclear. These distinctions limit any claim that every tribal enterprise or emergency service stopped operating.
A 477 Human Services application guide, marked revised September 2025, says recovery from the cyberattack limited paperwork-submission methods and fax was unavailable. It offered mail, office drop-off and email alternatives. This documents a continuing constraint on access to assistance services, but gives no exact day for the condition or its resolution.
The original two-page notice says information potentially involved included names, Social Security numbers, birth dates, contact details, tribal affiliation, employment information and direct-deposit bank details. Its conditional wording does not confirm that every category was accessed, that files were copied or that any particular number of people was affected. The confirmed data effect is loss of authorized access; ransomware, encryption, extortion and a responsible actor remain unverified.
In KFF Health News’ December 2025 report, broadband project manager Frances Goli described months of phone and computer disruption, lost information access and continuing recovery. The attack was among several causes of delay to a broadband project, alongside planning and administrative obstacles. The article’s wider discussion of longstanding connectivity and health-access gaps does not establish that the attack caused all those problems; a February 2025 council letter also mentions rebuilding the network without supplying a restoration date.
Aug. 16 is a discovery date, not a verified intrusion onset, and Aug. 19 is the documented public cyber acknowledgment. An official reply on the late-August post confirms restoration work was still underway Aug. 28, the latest precisely dated operational observation recovered. The later KFF account places recovery in December 2025 without identifying the interview day; its Dec. 17 publication date is not assigned as an exact outage date.
The initial-access route, exact duration of individual failures, final restoration date and scope of any unauthorized data access or copying remain unresolved. No victim statement or other cited source confirms ransomware or identifies the attackers. The available evidence does not establish whether extortion occurred.

County containing the affected government’s Tribal Business Center offices in Fort Hall. Physical headquarters anchor; does not imply a cyberattack on Bingham County government or that all four reservation counties’ services were disrupted.
Reservation jurisdiction of the affected sovereign tribal government. This association does not establish an outage of every household, enterprise or service; separately operated enterprises used unaffected systems.
Fort Hall community containing the affected tribal government’s business center and administrative offices. Physical headquarters/site relationship; the wider sovereign reservation requires a distinct government remit record, not this community’s footprint.
We reported a cyberattack affecting tribal government systems, possible involvement of personal information and disruption to government services and offices.
The Aug. 19 tribal notice warns employees and members that unauthorized access may have involved personal information. The accompanying post announces an Aug. 20 afternoon office reopening after a staff meeting.
Reports email and desk-phone failures, unavailable police records and redirected vehicle-inspection requests after the incident. It describes the tribal notice’s possible personal-information categories.
The tribes identify Aug. 16 discovery and Aug. 19 public notification, describe email, network and phone outages, and announce government-office closures Aug. 19 and Aug. 22-23. They warn of service delays during recovery.
The tribes announce an Aug. 28 return to work while network access and phones remain unavailable and services limited. Departments offer cellphone contacts, and staff are instructed to avoid unsanitized equipment.
Reports a staged staff return while phones remained down and computer recovery continued. It identifies gaming, economic development and agriculture, housing and high-school operations as unaffected because they used separate systems.
The former council treasurer lists rebuilding the information technology network after a malicious cyberattack among the council’s accomplishments.
Broadband manager Frances Goli describes months of phone and computer disruption and continuing recovery in a December 2025 interview. The attack was one of several causes delaying a tribal broadband project.
The application guide says cyberattack recovery limited paperwork-submission methods and fax was unavailable. It offers mail, office drop-off and email alternatives for people seeking tribal assistance.
Signed-in members can report an error, update, or missing source.